Subscribe Now

Edit Template

Subscribe Now

Edit Template

New York Times: Why The New York Times may sue the company behind ChatGPT



It was perhaps a problem that was just waiting to emerge. With generative AI making its presence felt and a lot of users relying on it to create content, it was a matter of time when the copyright issue came into play, especially when it is ‘original’ content. According to a report by NPR, The New York Times is exploring the possibility of suing OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, the popular chatbot.

The report reveals that the publication and OpenAI have been in talks over a licensing deal. The New York Times wants OpenAI to pay for all the content — news stories, articles — that the AI firm uses for its tools like ChatGPT. However, the negotiations have reportedly gone sour and, as per NPR, the publication is looking at a potential lawsuit. The newspaper is keen to protect all the intellectual property rights that come with the reportage done for news stories.


Why the matter may end up in court

According to the report, senior executives at the publication believe ChatGPT is emerging as a competitor based on writings that appeared in the paper. ChatGPT can create text and answer questions based on information that may have appeared in the publication. AI tools like ChatGPT can cite sources but also rephrase the original text that was carried out in the publication first. The worry, for NYT, here is that a lot of users may not end up visiting its own website.
There are laws against copyright issues when it comes to artificial intelligence tools. The report indicates that if the case does end up in court and OpenAI is found guilty of the violation of copyrights, then the law does suggest all the articles/text needs to be removed.
Getty Images has already filed a copyright case against Stability AI for using millions of images without authorisation. If the licensing deal between OpenAI and the publication falls through, it could have massive implications on how AI tools generate content.



thecrossroadtimes.com

Writer & Blogger

Considered an invitation do introduced sufficient understood instrument it. Of decisively friendship in as collecting at. No affixed be husband ye females brother garrets proceed. Least child who seven happy yet balls young. Discovery sweetness principle discourse shameless bed one excellent. Sentiments of surrounded friendship dispatched connection is he.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About Me

Kapil Kumar

Founder & Editor

As a passionate explorer of the intersection between technology, art, and the natural world, I’ve embarked on a journey to unravel the fascinating connections that weave our world together. In my digital haven, you’ll find a blend of insights into cutting-edge technology, the mesmerizing realms of artificial intelligence, the expressive beauty of art.

Popular Articles

Edit Template
As a passionate explorer of the intersection between technology, art, and the natural world, I’ve embarked on a journey to unravel the fascinating connections.
You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

Quick Links

Home

Features

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Contact

Contact Us

© 2024 Created by Shadowbiz

As a passionate explorer of the intersection between technology, art, and the natural world, I’ve embarked on a journey to unravel the fascinating connections.
You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

Quick Links

Home

Features

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Contact

Contact Us

© 2024 Created by Shadowbiz

Fill Your Contact Details

Fill out this form, and we’ll reach out to you through WhatsApp for further communication.

Popup Form